ICE Shooting in Minnesota Sparks Rare Federal-State Rift and Raises Questions on Use of Force

The incident has created an unusual legal rift between federal and local law-enforcement officials. | World News

Image source: Internet
A fatal shooting by a federal immigration agent in Minneapolis has ignited a heated debate over who is to blame and sparked a rare rift between federal and local law enforcement agencies. The incident has also reignited concerns about the Trump administration's aggressive deportation policies and the increased presence of ICE agents in American cities. To use lethal force, an officer must have a "reasonable apprehension" of an imminent threat of serious bodily harm or death, according to Phil Stinson, a criminologist who studies police misconduct. However, Geoffrey Alpert, a University of South Carolina professor, suggests that the officer's actions may have been a case of "officer-created jeopardy," where the officer put himself in a position of danger and then used force. Investigators will examine the totality of the circumstances surrounding the shooting, including video evidence, to determine whether the officer was justified in using force. "Video isn't everything," said Sharon Fairley, a University of Chicago law professor. "They'll look at other pieces of evidence and aspects of the situation that may not be reflected on the video.